|
 |
 |
|
Question:
Why does the deterministic jitter (DJ) seem to
disappear when I measure longer patterns using
a bathtub jitter method?
Answer: Bathtub jitter
measurements (also known as BERTScan, and Jitter
Peak on a BERTScope) are the most accurate way
of measuring the total jitter (TJ) at deep BER
levels, according to MJSQ[1].
Longer patterns such as PRBS-23 and PRBS-31
have jitter-inducing bit sequences that appear
very infrequently, and so can look like random
jitter (RJ) fooling the dual-Dirac math. If
possible, an alternative is to measure a clock
pattern (such as 1100) to get an accurate RJ/DJ
separation. Then, using the TJ measured on the
long pattern, subtract the RJ result from the
clock pattern to arrive at the long pattern
dual-Dirac DJ.
More information on Bathtub jitter
measurements can be found here.
[1] MJSQ:
Methodologies for Jitter and Signal Quality
Specification is a document written as part
of the INCITS project T11.2.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Science Puzzler
Q: If you wear polarized sunglasses while
driving, you have probably noticed the large spots, usually arranged in patterns,
on the rear windows of other cars. What are those spots, and why do polarized
sunglasses reveal them?
Click for answer
|
 |
Quote of Note
"It is amazing what you can
accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit."
— Harry S Truman
(1884 - 1972), 33rd President
of the United States
|
 |
Guess What?

(Click for answer)
|
|
 |
|